![]() ![]() These are full fledged chips, it makes sense that they would perform better, just like the worst viper outperforms the best tercel. I will belive you saying that the celerons potential was not revealed, but realize, it was not only compared to durons. Admit that they are right first, then say what you want. arejerjejjerjre, you started off at a disadvantage because the article strongly says the opposite of what you claim, and I grant you, that makes your job even harder. Who buys a magazine and reads it through (real reading, not liek a comic book) knowing its all crap? Just as always, you have to learn to pick your battles. So whats your point? This is anandtech, not amdzone or w/e, and as such, they are successful if and only if they are reliable. ![]() Yes, some things will do better when on different platforms, that is rather obviouse. Seriously, if that isn't spamming, what is? At least the spam in my e-mail comes with pr0n, with arejerjejjerjre its just filled with the same old crap over and over.Īrejerjejjerjre, just think for a sec, I'm only asking for one second, so I am hoping that you can comply. JAGedlion - Wednesday, Decemlink you know someone's in denial when they start to spam the boards like arejerjejjerjre.AMD offers faster processors for less in every price segment, not just the value one. The 3200+ costs about $20 less than a 3.2GHz P4 when configured, and the FX-51 is as fast or at least nearly as fast as the extreme edition for $200-$300 less. The Athlon 64's control the high performance sector already, and the 3000+ should extend that advantage into the upper mid-range segment. The Value segment is completely obvious, and that's because AMD offers mid-range performance processors at value prices. A 2800+ ($145) will do almost as well as a 2.8C P4 ($215).ĪMD really has Intel beat in all price segment. The problem is you're comparing the AMD processors to Celeron ones based on their ratings which were meant for P4's. I think you would be even more surprised. You should do a comparison of the 2500+ and 2800+ Athlon XP's and the 2.4C, 2.6C, and 2.8C Intel P4's. What are you talking about? Intels mid-range segment, 2.4-2.8GHz P4's, offer the same performance as AMD's value segment Barton processors. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |